Connect with us

News

Sir Don Sets Record Straight on Divorce, Says Sharon Asked for Separation Twice

Published

on

Spread the love

Prominent Nigerian businessman and politician, Sir Don, has broken his silence following AfrikMedia’s viral post, offering a clear and factual account of his short-lived marriage to Sharon Maduekwe who is now married to Shawn Faqua. In a statement made available to the press, Sir Don described the relationship as “a mistake that no man my age should ever make.”

He explained that the marriage was built on the wrong foundation and did not reflect the values of faith and discipline that guide his life today.

“There was nothing godly about the foundation of that marriage,” he said. “It was a decision I should never have made, and I take full responsibility. It cost me my peace, my dignity, some friends and temporarily strained my relationship with my daughters. I must admit my mistake and take responsibility for what I put my family through.”

Sir Don recounted meeting Sharon in 2016 when she was a struggling student working as an usher at his father’s burial. She confided in him that she was about to drop out of school, out of compassion, he gave full educational scholarship, a monthly graduate salary allowance and sponsored her brothers’ education.

Additionally, he also helped her parents, who lived in Ikorodu, by supporting her mother and a funded a business for her father.

He later funded her event planning training and established her event management company, covering all the start-up costs and guiding her through its early growth with funds and connections to clients.

“I believed she could do better for herself, so I invested heavily in her education and family. Unfortunately, that kindness was misinterpreted, and the relationship became something it should never have been,” he said.

The businessman/Lawyer revealed that from the start of the marriage, the relationship was toxic and filled with constant quarrels, disputes, and embarrassing situations including some involving misappropriation of funds from her clients, unpaid vendors etc… a pattern he said no man of his values should tolerate.

“I don’t want to wash her dirty linen in public … as I want her to remain in this new marriage and leave the fake Instagram life because I know what’s true and what’s not. That was not the life I wanted nor the reputation I worked hard to build,” he said. “It became clear that peace could not exist in that environment.”

He clarified that contrary to social media reports, Sharon herself asked for a divorce twice (with evidence) shortly after their wedding, before he eventually decided to end the marriage and the drama.

Don specifically emphasized that the marriage did not collapse suddenly but did as a result of accumulated issues, including what he described as Sharon’s lack of gratitude, sense of entitlement, financial greed, constant quarrels, disrespect and other sensitive situations he asked us not to mention.

“Let it be clear, I did not just wake up one morning and asked for a divorce. It was an accumulation of issues, and the situation had become unbearable. I ended the marriage so it would not end me,” he stated.

Don said he was shocked when Sharon demanded a substantial portion of his wealth in the divorce for a marriage that lasted less than nine months, making the entire process appear transactional and opportunistic.

Despite that, he ensured she was well settled, providing her with a roof over her head, a car, and cash to start afresh. When they were married her had promised her a trip to Paris, Italy etc, but literally while they were in divorce court, he kept his word and sent her on an exotic trip Paris and Italy with all expenses paid for. As she had never been to Europe before and he felt he make it happen.

“I prayed with her on our last day together and wished her well,” he said. “I even told her that I pray and hope she would find her own person, and in that moment, she even offered to curate my future wedding… that was how peaceful I wanted things to end.”

He expressed disappointment that despite his efforts to end things amicably, Sharon has continued to feed damaging narratives online. Even as at yesterday, Sharon’s father called to apologize to Don on behalf of his Daughter, stating that his family will forever be grateful for his kindness.

“I have kept quiet long enough, but it is time to correct these lies. I have moved on and so should she. I strongly advise her to desist from mentioning my name or that of my family in any capacity. The latter will be addressed legally and that includes blogs and press. I am not interested in public drama or deceitful storytelling.”

“Paying blogs to carry a story of the past for clout is never a way to start a new marriage. Testimonies built on false narrative is an attention a child of God must avoid. We both made mistakes and Our story is more of a lesson to Men and women. Our Testimony is God’s mercy in helping us find our person eventually despite both our mistakes.” He stated

Reflecting on his experience, Sir Don said the episode has been one of the biggest lessons of his life.

He was engaged to another woman when he met Sharon which destroyed that relationship, a mistake he said he will never make again.

“You do not marry your side-chick and expect wife material,” he stated. “Marriage must begin on the right foundation… built on respect, faith, and maturity. I have since learnt that lesson, and by the grace of God, my life today reflects peace, wisdom, and restoration.”

Sir Don noted that his current marriage has brought him stability and peace, restoring the bond with his family and daughters.

“God gave me another chance at life, and this time, I did it right …with the blessings of my family and in the presence of God. My current wife has brought peace and balance back into my life, and for that, I am grateful,” he said.

It is important to note that Don affirmed that this public clarification was necessary “to put an end to the half-truths, lies and misrepresentation” surrounding his name.

Sir Don says his focus is now on faith, family, and public service. “Mistakes teach. I learnt mine the hard way, and I thank God for mercy and grace. I have moved on in peace, and I intend to remain there.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Xenophobic attacks: Nigerian lives should not be sacrificed for foreign investors — Oshiomhole

Published

on

Spread the love

The senator representing Edo North, Adams Oshiomhole, has defended his call for the nationalisation of MTN and other South African-owned companies operating in Nigeria, saying the country must prioritise the lives of its citizens over foreign investment.

He made the call on Tuesday during an interview on Arise News, where he reacted to renewed xenophobic attacks against Nigerians in South Africa.

Recall that Oshiomhole, speaking last week on the floor of the Senate, said Nigeria must respond firmly to protect its citizens, stressing reciprocity in international relations.

His words, “I am aware that MTN is quoted, and therefore Nigerian shareholders can hold on, but we take away the South African rights,” he said.

Oshiomhole further proposed that the FG could nationalise affected companies, including financial institutions, and later re-privatise them under Nigerian control.

“And because of the issue… you nationalise, and then you re-privatise it so that Nigerians can take it over, and the profit they are taking out of Nigeria will be retained here. There will be no South African share in it,” he added.

Oshiomhole also claimed that South African authorities only responded meaningfully after diplomatic pressure from Nigeria, though he did not provide evidence for the assertion.

“Thereafter, President Ramaphosa came out clearly to condemn the attack on Black people. He didn’t do that until I attacked his interests,” he said.

He insisted that human life must take priority over economic considerations, arguing that investment should not come at the cost of Nigerian lives.

“If anything leads to the death of Nigeria, what is the value of wealth to the dead? We don’t want investors who invest at the expense of human blood. Even in my poverty, I value my life,” he said.

“Life is more important; we don’t want investors who invest at the expense of human blood. If you need Nigerian blood to service and you don’t care about Nigerian human blood because you want to attract investors, even in my poverty, I value my life.”

The former governor linked his position to what he described as repeated attacks on Nigerians in South Africa, alleging that justice had not been served in previous incidents.

“When a country, for the first time, killed Nigerians, they got away with it. The second time, they killed Nigerians; they got away with it. Third time, they killed Nigerians; they got away with it,” he said.

He added, “Under Buhari, there was an agreement. They broke it. They are killing Nigerians. Nobody is in prison for murder, or extrajudicial murder.

“You are talking about law. Is there no law protecting the life of foreigners who live in your country? Even if they were there illegally, there are legal ways to repatriate them, to deport them,” he said.

 

Continue Reading

News

UK Exposes Russia’s Network Trafficking Nigerians To Fight In Ukraine

Published

on

Spread the love

The United Kingdom has taken widespread action and imposed sanctions against a shadowy network of traffickers, foreign recruiters and drone suppliers blamed for Moscow’s war in Ukraine and allegedly trafficking vulnerable Nigerians and other nationals to fight in Ukraine.

The UK government on Wednesday said 35 individuals and entities linked to what it described as a “barbaric pipeline” that lures desperate migrants with false promises, only to funnel them into frontline combat or forced labour in Russia’s expanding drone factories have been severely sanctioned.

UK officials noted that recruiters allegedly tied to the Russian have been targeting citizens from countries including Nigeria, Egypt, Iraq and Ivory Coast—offering jobs, education or migration pathways—but ultimately deploying victims to Ukraine under harsh, often deadly conditions.

The notorious Alabuga Start programme, is linked to a sanctioned Russian entity that allegedly channels foreign recruits into drone manufacturing hubs and reports said that in some instances vulnerable Nigerians and nationals of others countries unfortunate to be recruited are sent directly to the battlefield with little or no training and effectively used as “cannon fodder,” according to UK authorities.

“This is exploitation at its most brutal,” UK official Stephen Doughty said, describing the networks as both predatory and integral to sustaining Russia’s war effort. “We are exposing and dismantling the pipelines that traffic vulnerable people and feed illicit components into Putin’s drone factories.”

The sanctions also strike at the technological backbone of Russia’s escalating aerial assaults, a statement from the UK High Commission in Abuja said.

Among those listed is Pavel Nikitin, whose company produces the VT-40—one of the low-cost, mass-produced drones increasingly deployed in attacks across Ukrainian cities. The urgency of the action is underscored by a sharp escalation in drone warfare, the statement added.

In March 2026, Russia reportedly launched more than 200 drones per day—the highest rate since the war with Ukraine began—intensifying strikes on civilian areas and critical infrastructure. Security analysts warn that Moscow’s reliance on cheap, high-volume drone production has reshaped the battlefield and prolonged the conflict.

Nigerian authorities are reportedly disturbed over the alleged role of Polina Alexandrovna Azarnykh, identified as a central figure in coordinating the movement of foreign recruits into Russia before their deployment to Ukraine. British officials also said some of those recruited have already died.

British Deputy High Commissioner in Abuja Gill Lever confirmed that Nigerians have been directly affected, warning that the schemes deliberately prey on economic vulnerability.

“These sanctions shine a light on those exploiting innocent Nigerians to sustain an illegal war,” she said, noting that many victims were misled into believing they were securing legitimate opportunities abroad.

Her comments came about following recent warnings by Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which had warned Nigerian citizens against suspicious overseas job offers linked to the conflict.

 

Continue Reading

News

Court orders interim takeover of Sylva’s nine properties

Published

on

Spread the love

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the interim forfeiture of nine properties linked to the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, to the Federal Government.

Justice Obiora Egwuatu made the order after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission counsel, Oluwaleke Atolagbe, moved an ex parte motion to the effect.

Our correspondent reports that though Justice Egwuatu delivered the ruling on April 24, the enrolled order was sighted on Wednesday, May 6.

The affected assets are located across high-value areas in Abuja.

They include four blocks of terraces at Dakibiyu; a duplex with penthouse and office complex at No. 3, Niger Street, MStreet; one standalone duplex at Villa 1, Unit 1, Palm Springs Estate, Mpape; and a block of flats with 10 units of flats at No. 8, Sefadu Street, Wuse Zone 4, Abuja.

Others are blocks of flats with six units of flats at No. 1, Mubi Close, Garki, Abuja; two blocks with 12 units of flats at Plot 1181, Thaba Tseka Crescent, Wuse II, Abuja; one standalone duplex at No. 18, Nile Lake, Plot 1271, Maitama, Abuja,

The ninth property is a two-block building, which is currently occupied by the National Information Technology Development Agency, and is located at No. 5, Aguta Street, Garki, Abuja.

The judge said: “It is hereby ordered as follows: An interim order of this honourable court is made forfeiting the properties listed in the schedule attached herein, being properties suspected to be proceeds of some unlawful activities pending the publication and hearing of the motion on notice for final forfeiture order of the said properties.

“An order of this honourable court is made directing the publication of the interim order under order (1) above for anyone who is interested in the property to appear before this honourable court to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture should not be made in favour of the Federal Government of Nigeria.”

Justice Egwuatu also granted the EFCC’s request that the publication of the order shall be made in any two of the following newspapers: Thisday, Guardian, PUNCH, Vanguard, Tribune or Independent Newspapers within seven days from the receipt of the certified true copy of the order.

The judge then adjourned the matter until May 25 for a report of compliance.

The commission had, in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/607/2026, filed the application under provisions of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act, 2006.

Moving the motion, Atolagbe sought an interim order, forfeiting the properties to the Federal Government pending the publication and hearing of the motion on notice for a final forfeiture order of the said properties.

He said the properties were suspected to be proceeds of some unlawful activities.

The lawyer urged the court to direct the anti-graft agency to make the publication of the order in any national newspaper for anyone who is interested in the properties to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture should not be made in favour of the Federal Government.

Our correspondent  reports that Sylva, a former governor of Bayelsa State, has also been mentioned in connection with an alleged failed coup plot against President Bola Tinubu, though he has not been formally charged in that case and is reportedly still at large.

Continue Reading

Trending