Connect with us

News

Otti’s LP bloc seeks reconciliation as court sacks Abure

Published

on

Spread the love

The Labour Party faction loyal to Abia State Governor, Alex Otti, has called for reconciliation and unity in the party following Wednesday’s judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission  to recognise the Senator Nenadi Usman-led caretaker committee and effectively sacked Julius Abure as national chairman.

The Interim National Chairman of the faction, Senator Nenadi Usman, made the appeal in a statement issued by her Senior Special Adviser on Media, Ken Asogwa, describing the ruling as a critical opportunity to heal deep-seated divisions within the party rather than worsen the leadership crisis.

“We received with profound joy and relief the judgment of the Federal High Court, which ordered INEC to immediately recognise Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership as the only valid, authentic and legitimate leadership of the Labour Party,” the statement said.

“Although the journey to this point was protracted, difficult and at times turbulent, the Labour Party urges its members and supporters not to celebrate with triumphalism. Rather, this moment should be embraced as a solemn opportunity for genuine reconciliation.”

According to Usman, the judgment should mark a turning point for the party.

“For us, it is a no victor, no vanquished moment. Let it be clearly stated that there is only one united and indivisible Labour Party in Nigeria. This judgment must mark a new beginning anchored on unity, healing and collective progress,” she said.

However, in a swift statement on Wednesday, Abure rejected the judgment, vowing to challenge it on appeal.

In a statement issued by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Obiora Ifoh, Abure insisted that the judgment contradicted the April 2025 verdict of the Supreme Court on the party’s leadership dispute.

He described Justice Lifu’s verdict as a misinterpretation of the apex court’s decision and an unwarranted intrusion into the internal affairs of the party.

“Although we are yet to see the Certified True Copy of the judgment to fully make detailed comments, it is clear from the brief available to us that the party will appeal,” Ifoh said.

Earlier on Wednesday, Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court held that Abure’s tenure as national chairman had elapsed and consequently ordered INEC to recognise the caretaker committee headed by Usman pending the conduct of the party’s national convention.

Reacting to the judgment, the Otti-backed faction urged all tendencies within the party, including those dissatisfied with the ruling, to embrace dialogue in the interest of rebuilding the party.

“Accordingly, the Labour Party calls on all members who may feel aggrieved by the current state of affairs – including those against whom today’s judgment was delivered – to sheathe their swords and embrace dialogue in the supreme interest of the party,” Usman said.

“We sue for peace, plead for dialogue, and seek sincere reconciliation. There is enormous work ahead in rebuilding the Labour Party into a strong, credible and virile opposition platform in Nigeria, a task that can only be accomplished in an atmosphere of unity, cohesion and mutual respect.”

As part of efforts to restore internal harmony, Usman announced plans to constitute a reconciliation mechanism.

“In furtherance of this commitment to peace and reconciliation, the party shall immediately constitute a Truce and Reconciliation Committee mandated to engage all aggrieved members and restore lasting harmony within the party,” she said.

The faction also called on INEC to fully comply with the judgment.

“As a law-abiding institution and a major stakeholder in Nigeria’s democratic process, the Labour Party calls on INEC to end all unnecessary distractions by fully complying with today’s judgment and according Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership the formal recognition clearly and unambiguously directed by the court,” the statement added.

On its part, the Abure-led faction alleged procedural irregularities in the handling of the case, claiming it was denied fair hearing and that warning signs emerged even before judgment was delivered.

“Before today’s judgment, we had suspected it might go this way because of the body language around the court. When the matter was first filed, it was assigned to Justice Omotosho, but suddenly there was a somersault, as another similar matter was filed, the first was withdrawn and the case was reassigned to Justice Peter Lifu. That was a red flag for us,” the statement said.

The faction further alleged that the court refused to allow it respond to issues raised in a counter-affidavit before adjourning for judgment.

“The court refused us the opportunity to respond to issues raised in the counter-affidavit filed by other parties and quickly adjourned for judgment. That was the second red flag,” Ifoh said.

Abure’s camp also questioned the substance of the ruling, arguing that it contradicted established judicial precedents.

“Nigerians should remember that the Court of Appeal had pronounced Julius Abure’s National Working Committee as the authentic leadership of the party. That was what Nenadi Usman took to the Supreme Court, arguing that the courts lacked the power to determine party leadership.

“Ironically, today a Federal High Court has gone ahead to pronounce someone as caretaker national chairman of a party. So what is the judiciary turning into?” the statement queried.

The faction insisted that the Supreme Court had clearly ruled that courts lacked jurisdiction to appoint leaders for political parties and maintained that no leadership vacuum existed in the Labour Party.

“Even the Supreme Court never said our tenure had expired. It simply declined jurisdiction, holding that leadership matters are internal affairs of the party,” the statement said.

It further defended the March 2024 national convention, insisting that the tenure of the party’s executive was still subsisting at the time the convention was held.

“So for the court to say that the tenure had expired and that a vacuum existed is laughable. It is also curious how the court arrived at that conclusion without interrogating the validity and legality of the national convention held on March 27, 2024,” the statement added.

Despite the legal battle, the Abure faction urged party members to remain calm, insisting it would exhaust all legal avenues to reclaim its position.

“The party is not for sale, and no amount of financial power will make us abdicate our leadership position,” it warned.

The leadership crisis in the Labour Party followed an expanded stakeholders’ meeting held in Umuahia, Abia State, where the National Executive Committee resolved to remove Abure as national chairman and constituted a 29-member caretaker committee headed by Usman.

The meeting was hosted by Governor Otti and chaired by the party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

In April 2025, the Supreme Court set aside an earlier judgment of the Court of Appeal that had recognised Abure as national chairman, holding that appellate courts lacked jurisdiction to determine the leadership of a political party.

Justice Lifu, relying on the subsisting position of the Supreme Court, ruled that the caretaker committee constituted by the NEC remained the only valid authority to act for and represent the Labour Party pending the conduct of a national convention.

Source: Punch.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Xenophobic attacks: Nigerian lives should not be sacrificed for foreign investors — Oshiomhole

Published

on

Spread the love

The senator representing Edo North, Adams Oshiomhole, has defended his call for the nationalisation of MTN and other South African-owned companies operating in Nigeria, saying the country must prioritise the lives of its citizens over foreign investment.

He made the call on Tuesday during an interview on Arise News, where he reacted to renewed xenophobic attacks against Nigerians in South Africa.

Recall that Oshiomhole, speaking last week on the floor of the Senate, said Nigeria must respond firmly to protect its citizens, stressing reciprocity in international relations.

His words, “I am aware that MTN is quoted, and therefore Nigerian shareholders can hold on, but we take away the South African rights,” he said.

Oshiomhole further proposed that the FG could nationalise affected companies, including financial institutions, and later re-privatise them under Nigerian control.

“And because of the issue… you nationalise, and then you re-privatise it so that Nigerians can take it over, and the profit they are taking out of Nigeria will be retained here. There will be no South African share in it,” he added.

Oshiomhole also claimed that South African authorities only responded meaningfully after diplomatic pressure from Nigeria, though he did not provide evidence for the assertion.

“Thereafter, President Ramaphosa came out clearly to condemn the attack on Black people. He didn’t do that until I attacked his interests,” he said.

He insisted that human life must take priority over economic considerations, arguing that investment should not come at the cost of Nigerian lives.

“If anything leads to the death of Nigeria, what is the value of wealth to the dead? We don’t want investors who invest at the expense of human blood. Even in my poverty, I value my life,” he said.

“Life is more important; we don’t want investors who invest at the expense of human blood. If you need Nigerian blood to service and you don’t care about Nigerian human blood because you want to attract investors, even in my poverty, I value my life.”

The former governor linked his position to what he described as repeated attacks on Nigerians in South Africa, alleging that justice had not been served in previous incidents.

“When a country, for the first time, killed Nigerians, they got away with it. The second time, they killed Nigerians; they got away with it. Third time, they killed Nigerians; they got away with it,” he said.

He added, “Under Buhari, there was an agreement. They broke it. They are killing Nigerians. Nobody is in prison for murder, or extrajudicial murder.

“You are talking about law. Is there no law protecting the life of foreigners who live in your country? Even if they were there illegally, there are legal ways to repatriate them, to deport them,” he said.

 

Continue Reading

News

UK Exposes Russia’s Network Trafficking Nigerians To Fight In Ukraine

Published

on

Spread the love

The United Kingdom has taken widespread action and imposed sanctions against a shadowy network of traffickers, foreign recruiters and drone suppliers blamed for Moscow’s war in Ukraine and allegedly trafficking vulnerable Nigerians and other nationals to fight in Ukraine.

The UK government on Wednesday said 35 individuals and entities linked to what it described as a “barbaric pipeline” that lures desperate migrants with false promises, only to funnel them into frontline combat or forced labour in Russia’s expanding drone factories have been severely sanctioned.

UK officials noted that recruiters allegedly tied to the Russian have been targeting citizens from countries including Nigeria, Egypt, Iraq and Ivory Coast—offering jobs, education or migration pathways—but ultimately deploying victims to Ukraine under harsh, often deadly conditions.

The notorious Alabuga Start programme, is linked to a sanctioned Russian entity that allegedly channels foreign recruits into drone manufacturing hubs and reports said that in some instances vulnerable Nigerians and nationals of others countries unfortunate to be recruited are sent directly to the battlefield with little or no training and effectively used as “cannon fodder,” according to UK authorities.

“This is exploitation at its most brutal,” UK official Stephen Doughty said, describing the networks as both predatory and integral to sustaining Russia’s war effort. “We are exposing and dismantling the pipelines that traffic vulnerable people and feed illicit components into Putin’s drone factories.”

The sanctions also strike at the technological backbone of Russia’s escalating aerial assaults, a statement from the UK High Commission in Abuja said.

Among those listed is Pavel Nikitin, whose company produces the VT-40—one of the low-cost, mass-produced drones increasingly deployed in attacks across Ukrainian cities. The urgency of the action is underscored by a sharp escalation in drone warfare, the statement added.

In March 2026, Russia reportedly launched more than 200 drones per day—the highest rate since the war with Ukraine began—intensifying strikes on civilian areas and critical infrastructure. Security analysts warn that Moscow’s reliance on cheap, high-volume drone production has reshaped the battlefield and prolonged the conflict.

Nigerian authorities are reportedly disturbed over the alleged role of Polina Alexandrovna Azarnykh, identified as a central figure in coordinating the movement of foreign recruits into Russia before their deployment to Ukraine. British officials also said some of those recruited have already died.

British Deputy High Commissioner in Abuja Gill Lever confirmed that Nigerians have been directly affected, warning that the schemes deliberately prey on economic vulnerability.

“These sanctions shine a light on those exploiting innocent Nigerians to sustain an illegal war,” she said, noting that many victims were misled into believing they were securing legitimate opportunities abroad.

Her comments came about following recent warnings by Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which had warned Nigerian citizens against suspicious overseas job offers linked to the conflict.

 

Continue Reading

News

Court orders interim takeover of Sylva’s nine properties

Published

on

Spread the love

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the interim forfeiture of nine properties linked to the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, to the Federal Government.

Justice Obiora Egwuatu made the order after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission counsel, Oluwaleke Atolagbe, moved an ex parte motion to the effect.

Our correspondent reports that though Justice Egwuatu delivered the ruling on April 24, the enrolled order was sighted on Wednesday, May 6.

The affected assets are located across high-value areas in Abuja.

They include four blocks of terraces at Dakibiyu; a duplex with penthouse and office complex at No. 3, Niger Street, MStreet; one standalone duplex at Villa 1, Unit 1, Palm Springs Estate, Mpape; and a block of flats with 10 units of flats at No. 8, Sefadu Street, Wuse Zone 4, Abuja.

Others are blocks of flats with six units of flats at No. 1, Mubi Close, Garki, Abuja; two blocks with 12 units of flats at Plot 1181, Thaba Tseka Crescent, Wuse II, Abuja; one standalone duplex at No. 18, Nile Lake, Plot 1271, Maitama, Abuja,

The ninth property is a two-block building, which is currently occupied by the National Information Technology Development Agency, and is located at No. 5, Aguta Street, Garki, Abuja.

The judge said: “It is hereby ordered as follows: An interim order of this honourable court is made forfeiting the properties listed in the schedule attached herein, being properties suspected to be proceeds of some unlawful activities pending the publication and hearing of the motion on notice for final forfeiture order of the said properties.

“An order of this honourable court is made directing the publication of the interim order under order (1) above for anyone who is interested in the property to appear before this honourable court to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture should not be made in favour of the Federal Government of Nigeria.”

Justice Egwuatu also granted the EFCC’s request that the publication of the order shall be made in any two of the following newspapers: Thisday, Guardian, PUNCH, Vanguard, Tribune or Independent Newspapers within seven days from the receipt of the certified true copy of the order.

The judge then adjourned the matter until May 25 for a report of compliance.

The commission had, in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/607/2026, filed the application under provisions of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act, 2006.

Moving the motion, Atolagbe sought an interim order, forfeiting the properties to the Federal Government pending the publication and hearing of the motion on notice for a final forfeiture order of the said properties.

He said the properties were suspected to be proceeds of some unlawful activities.

The lawyer urged the court to direct the anti-graft agency to make the publication of the order in any national newspaper for anyone who is interested in the properties to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture should not be made in favour of the Federal Government.

Our correspondent  reports that Sylva, a former governor of Bayelsa State, has also been mentioned in connection with an alleged failed coup plot against President Bola Tinubu, though he has not been formally charged in that case and is reportedly still at large.

Continue Reading

Trending