The late Muhammadu Buhari, who passed away on Sunday at 82, left an indelible mark on Nigeria’s political and digital consciousness.
His eight years at the helm were not just about policy pronouncements and economic reforms; they were also a fertile ground for viral moments, intense digital outrage, and sustained, often humorous, online criticism.
As the nation mourns his passing, these are 10 of the most talked-about and controversial Buhari moments that dominated social media discourse and will forever define a significant era in Nigerian public life
1. ‘Lazy Nigerian Youths’ Trend (2018)
In 2018, during a high-profile engagement at the Commonwealth Business Forum in London, then-President Buhari delivered a statement that would reverberate across Nigeria’s digital space for years.
He suggested that many young Nigerians were content to “do nothing” despite growing up in an oil-rich country, implying a sense of entitlement.
Though he didn’t use the exact phrase “lazy Nigerian youths,” that loaded interpretation is precisely how it exploded and trended online.
The backlash was immediate and massive, with #LazyNigerianYouths flooding timelines for weeks, becoming both a hashtag of protest and a symbol of perceived governmental disconnect from the struggles of young Nigerians.
2. The ‘Jubril of Sudan’ Rumour
Following President Buhari’s prolonged medical trip in London in 2017, the rumour mill went into overdrive. Bizarre conspiracy theories primarily propagated online, emerged claiming that he had died and had been secretly replaced by a clone named “Jubril” from Sudan.
Despite its absurdity, the theory gained surprising momentum on social media, becoming a persistent talking point until Buhari himself publicly debunked it in 2018.
Addressing Nigerians in Poland, he stated, with a rare chuckle: “It’s the real me, I assure you.”
Yet, even his direct denial only seemed to fuel more memes, jokes, and wilder speculation.
3. The Twitter Ban (2021)
Perhaps one of the most drastic and globally condemned actions of his presidency was the suspension of Twitter’s operations in Nigeria in June 2021.
The move came swiftly after Twitter deleted one of Buhari’s tweets referencing the civil war, which the platform deemed in violation of its rules against abusive behaviour.
The ban, which lasted seven months, sparked widespread global criticism from human rights organisations and international bodies, who decried it as an infringement on fundamental freedoms.
Domestically, it led to a massive surge in Virtual Private Network usage among Nigerian users, who found alternative ways to access the platform, underscoring the resilience of digital engagement in the face of state censorship.
4. Border Closure Policy (2019–2020)
In August 2019, President Buhari’s administration took the drastic step of unilaterally shutting Nigeria’s land borders, primarily to curb smuggling and stimulate local agricultural production.
While some proponents lauded the move as a necessary step for national self-sufficiency, social media was quickly flooded with a torrent of complaints.
Nigerians vented their frustrations over soaring food inflation, the collapse of cross-border trade, and the worsening economic hardship for countless small businesses and ordinary citizens.
The policy’s perceived failures became a constant target of online lament.
5. #EndSARS and Delayed National Address (2020)
The nationwide #EndSARS protests against police brutality and bad governance in October 2020 represented one of the most significant challenges to Buhari’s authority.
A defining moment of that period was the President’s prolonged silence for days as the protests escalated, culminating in the tragic Lekki Toll Gate shooting.
His eventual national address, when it finally came, was widely criticised for its perceived lack of empathy and failure to directly address the Lekki incident.
The hashtag #WhereIsBuhari trended heavily, reflecting public frustration over his apparent detachment during a critical national crisis.
6. Cashless Policy Chaos (2023)
In the twilight of his administration, Buhari’s government, through the Central Bank of Nigeria, introduced a controversial cashless policy alongside a radical redesign of the naira currency notes.
The implementation of this policy led to severe cash scarcity across the nation, triggering widespread public frustration, economic disruption, and even violent protests in some areas.
Angry Nigerians, unable to access their funds for daily transactions, incessantly vented their fury online and offline, creating another potent wave of criticism that followed his government to its final days.
7. “My Wife Belongs to the Kitchen…” (2016)
In October 2016, during a joint press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin, President Buhari responded to public criticism from his wife, Aisha, about his administration.
His now-infamous retort quickly went viral globally
“I don’t know which party my wife belongs to, but she belongs to my kitchen, my living room, and the other room.”
The statement sparked immediate and widespread criticism from feminists, human rights advocates, and international observers, drawing global condemnation for its perceived patriarchal and dismissive tone.
It trended heavily with feminist hashtags and became a defining moment in the discourse around gender roles in Nigerian leadership.
8. “I Belong to Everybody and to Nobody” (2015)
This eloquent line, delivered as the opener of his inaugural speech in 2015, earned resounding applause and was initially seen as a powerful commitment to impartiality and national unity.
However, as his tenure unfolded and critics pointed to perceived ethnic or partisan favouritism in appointments and policies, many Nigerians began to use this quote sarcastically online.
It became a punchline, subtly expressing disillusionment with what some saw as a deviation from his initial, inclusive promise.
9. Medical Trips to London
Throughout his two terms, President Buhari’s frequent and often prolonged medical trips to London became a consistent source of national debate and social media commentary.
Hashtags like #LondonIsCalling and #FixOurHospitals regularly trended during his absences, reflecting public frustration with the state of Nigeria’s healthcare system and concerns over the cost and duration of his foreign medical care.
Memes depicting an “absentee president” or a leader out of touch with the country’s realities frequently accompanied these discussions.
10. “Bubu” and Meme Culture
Affectionately, or sometimes derisively, nicknamed “Bubu” by Nigerians online, President Buhari, despite his known detachment from social media, inadvertently became a central and recurring figure in the nation’s vibrant meme culture.
Images and videos of him napping at public events, fumbling speeches, or remaining silent during critical national crises were routinely captured, repurposed, and transformed into viral content.
His stoic expressions, often combined with trending topics, ensured that Buhari, whether by design or accident, was one of the most discussed, and certainly one of the most memeified Nigerian presidents on the internet.
The senator representing Edo North, Adams Oshiomhole, has defended his call for the nationalisation of MTN and other South African-owned companies operating in Nigeria, saying the country must prioritise the lives of its citizens over foreign investment.
He made the call on Tuesday during an interview on Arise News, where he reacted to renewed xenophobic attacks against Nigerians in South Africa.
Recall that Oshiomhole, speaking last week on the floor of the Senate, said Nigeria must respond firmly to protect its citizens, stressing reciprocity in international relations.
His words, “I am aware that MTN is quoted, and therefore Nigerian shareholders can hold on, but we take away the South African rights,” he said.
Oshiomhole further proposed that the FG could nationalise affected companies, including financial institutions, and later re-privatise them under Nigerian control.
“And because of the issue… you nationalise, and then you re-privatise it so that Nigerians can take it over, and the profit they are taking out of Nigeria will be retained here. There will be no South African share in it,” he added.
Oshiomhole also claimed that South African authorities only responded meaningfully after diplomatic pressure from Nigeria, though he did not provide evidence for the assertion.
“Thereafter, President Ramaphosa came out clearly to condemn the attack on Black people. He didn’t do that until I attacked his interests,” he said.
He insisted that human life must take priority over economic considerations, arguing that investment should not come at the cost of Nigerian lives.
“If anything leads to the death of Nigeria, what is the value of wealth to the dead? We don’t want investors who invest at the expense of human blood. Even in my poverty, I value my life,” he said.
“Life is more important; we don’t want investors who invest at the expense of human blood. If you need Nigerian blood to service and you don’t care about Nigerian human blood because you want to attract investors, even in my poverty, I value my life.”
The former governor linked his position to what he described as repeated attacks on Nigerians in South Africa, alleging that justice had not been served in previous incidents.
“When a country, for the first time, killed Nigerians, they got away with it. The second time, they killed Nigerians; they got away with it. Third time, they killed Nigerians; they got away with it,” he said.
He added, “Under Buhari, there was an agreement. They broke it. They are killing Nigerians. Nobody is in prison for murder, or extrajudicial murder.
“You are talking about law. Is there no law protecting the life of foreigners who live in your country? Even if they were there illegally, there are legal ways to repatriate them, to deport them,” he said.
The United Kingdom has taken widespread action and imposed sanctions against a shadowy network of traffickers, foreign recruiters and drone suppliers blamed for Moscow’s war in Ukraine and allegedly trafficking vulnerable Nigerians and other nationals to fight in Ukraine.
The UK government on Wednesday said 35 individuals and entities linked to what it described as a “barbaric pipeline” that lures desperate migrants with false promises, only to funnel them into frontline combat or forced labour in Russia’s expanding drone factories have been severely sanctioned.
UK officials noted that recruiters allegedly tied to the Russian have been targeting citizens from countries including Nigeria, Egypt, Iraq and Ivory Coast—offering jobs, education or migration pathways—but ultimately deploying victims to Ukraine under harsh, often deadly conditions.
The notorious Alabuga Start programme, is linked to a sanctioned Russian entity that allegedly channels foreign recruits into drone manufacturing hubs and reports said that in some instances vulnerable Nigerians and nationals of others countries unfortunate to be recruited are sent directly to the battlefield with little or no training and effectively used as “cannon fodder,” according to UK authorities.
“This is exploitation at its most brutal,” UK official Stephen Doughty said, describing the networks as both predatory and integral to sustaining Russia’s war effort. “We are exposing and dismantling the pipelines that traffic vulnerable people and feed illicit components into Putin’s drone factories.”
The sanctions also strike at the technological backbone of Russia’s escalating aerial assaults, a statement from the UK High Commission in Abuja said.
Among those listed is Pavel Nikitin, whose company produces the VT-40—one of the low-cost, mass-produced drones increasingly deployed in attacks across Ukrainian cities. The urgency of the action is underscored by a sharp escalation in drone warfare, the statement added.
In March 2026, Russia reportedly launched more than 200 drones per day—the highest rate since the war with Ukraine began—intensifying strikes on civilian areas and critical infrastructure. Security analysts warn that Moscow’s reliance on cheap, high-volume drone production has reshaped the battlefield and prolonged the conflict.
Nigerian authorities are reportedly disturbed over the alleged role of Polina Alexandrovna Azarnykh, identified as a central figure in coordinating the movement of foreign recruits into Russia before their deployment to Ukraine. British officials also said some of those recruited have already died.
British Deputy High Commissioner in Abuja Gill Lever confirmed that Nigerians have been directly affected, warning that the schemes deliberately prey on economic vulnerability.
“These sanctions shine a light on those exploiting innocent Nigerians to sustain an illegal war,” she said, noting that many victims were misled into believing they were securing legitimate opportunities abroad.
Her comments came about following recent warnings by Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which had warned Nigerian citizens against suspicious overseas job offers linked to the conflict.
The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the interim forfeiture of nine properties linked to the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, to the Federal Government.
Justice Obiora Egwuatu made the order after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission counsel, Oluwaleke Atolagbe, moved an ex parte motion to the effect.
Our correspondent reports that though Justice Egwuatu delivered the ruling on April 24, the enrolled order was sighted on Wednesday, May 6.
The affected assets are located across high-value areas in Abuja.
They include four blocks of terraces at Dakibiyu; a duplex with penthouse and office complex at No. 3, Niger Street, MStreet; one standalone duplex at Villa 1, Unit 1, Palm Springs Estate, Mpape; and a block of flats with 10 units of flats at No. 8, Sefadu Street, Wuse Zone 4, Abuja.
Others are blocks of flats with six units of flats at No. 1, Mubi Close, Garki, Abuja; two blocks with 12 units of flats at Plot 1181, Thaba Tseka Crescent, Wuse II, Abuja; one standalone duplex at No. 18, Nile Lake, Plot 1271, Maitama, Abuja,
The ninth property is a two-block building, which is currently occupied by the National Information Technology Development Agency, and is located at No. 5, Aguta Street, Garki, Abuja.
The judge said: “It is hereby ordered as follows: An interim order of this honourable court is made forfeiting the properties listed in the schedule attached herein, being properties suspected to be proceeds of some unlawful activities pending the publication and hearing of the motion on notice for final forfeiture order of the said properties.
“An order of this honourable court is made directing the publication of the interim order under order (1) above for anyone who is interested in the property to appear before this honourable court to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture should not be made in favour of the Federal Government of Nigeria.”
Justice Egwuatu also granted the EFCC’s request that the publication of the order shall be made in any two of the following newspapers: Thisday, Guardian, PUNCH, Vanguard, Tribune or Independent Newspapers within seven days from the receipt of the certified true copy of the order.
The judge then adjourned the matter until May 25 for a report of compliance.
The commission had, in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/607/2026, filed the application under provisions of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act, 2006.
Moving the motion, Atolagbe sought an interim order, forfeiting the properties to the Federal Government pending the publication and hearing of the motion on notice for a final forfeiture order of the said properties.
He said the properties were suspected to be proceeds of some unlawful activities.
The lawyer urged the court to direct the anti-graft agency to make the publication of the order in any national newspaper for anyone who is interested in the properties to show cause within 14 days why the final order of forfeiture should not be made in favour of the Federal Government.
Our correspondent reports that Sylva, a former governor of Bayelsa State, has also been mentioned in connection with an alleged failed coup plot against President Bola Tinubu, though he has not been formally charged in that case and is reportedly still at large.